Vaccinæ vindicia; or, defence of vaccination : containing a refutation of the cases, and reasonings on the same, in Dr. Rowley's and Dr. Moseley's late extraordinary pamphlets against vaccination. In two letters to Dr. Moseley. With the Report of the Medical Council of the Royal Jennerian Society. And the debate in the House of Commons (July 2, 1806) on a motion by Lord Henry Petty, for enlightening the people of England on the subject of vaccination, [&c] / By Robert John Thornton.

  • Thornton, Robert John, 1768?-1837.
Date:
1806
Catalogue details

Licence: Public Domain Mark

Credit: Vaccinæ vindicia; or, defence of vaccination : containing a refutation of the cases, and reasonings on the same, in Dr. Rowley's and Dr. Moseley's late extraordinary pamphlets against vaccination. In two letters to Dr. Moseley. With the Report of the Medical Council of the Royal Jennerian Society. And the debate in the House of Commons (July 2, 1806) on a motion by Lord Henry Petty, for enlightening the people of England on the subject of vaccination, [&c] / By Robert John Thornton. Source: Wellcome Collection.

Provider: This material has been provided by London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine Library & Archives Service. The original may be consulted at London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine Library & Archives Service.

    19/524
    A most severe public animadversion on the opposers of Vaccination in France by the Jury of Health f NoicJ 116 Experiments in France with Small-pox matter inserted -lifter Cow-pock, proving the security from the Small- pox as proceeding from Vaccination « . . ib. Severe reflections on the French and English Anti-vac- cinists, in language too strong to be translated . II9 13, 14. THE SLOANE-STREET CASES . 121 Dr. Moseley's statement . • . . . ib. How different from Dr. Rowley's statement . ib. Mr. Richardson's true statement of these cases proved (not to have received the Small-pox J . . .123 15. A CHELSEA CASE . . . . 125 Dr. Moseley's statement ..... ib- Dr. Rowley's statement . , . . . . ib. Observations on their statements . . . . ib. Letter from Mr. Sandys to Dr. Baillie refuting this case . . . . . . . .125 Second letter from the same . . • . ib. Some doubts as to the correctness of Mr. Sandy's nar- rative ib. The subject at any rate proved to have received a spu- rious pustule, probably owing to a Tinea Capitis {Scald Head J . , . . . ISS Letter from Mr. Wilson to Dr. Thornton upon this case . «..,. . . . . ibo Strictures on the sentiments of Dr. Rowley, relative to the several Cow-pock failures . . . . 129 Dr. Moseley's curious sentiments as to the cause of the preservative power of the Cow-pox . • , \iO A smile at some of Dr. Moseley's opinions . « 13 J His judicious observation relative to the Scald Head as preventing the reception of the Small- pox .1.12 The Inoculation of the Cow-pock shewn to be a science equally with the Small-pox , . . , ib.