Reform of the University of Glasgow : considered with reference to the published report of the Royal Commissioners of Visitation appointed by Sir Robert Peel, and to the evidence and documents contained in their unpublished appendix, embracing the whole of Mr Oswald's bill for the regulation of that university, compared, clause by clause, with the constitution proposed by those commissioners / by a graduate of the University.

Date:
1835
  • Books
  • Online

Available online

view Reform of the University of Glasgow : considered with reference to the published report of the Royal Commissioners of Visitation appointed by Sir Robert Peel, and to the evidence and documents contained in their unpublished appendix, embracing the whole of Mr Oswald's bill for the regulation of that university, compared, clause by clause, with the constitution proposed by those commissioners / by a graduate of the University.

Contains: 40 images

Public Domain Mark

You can use this work for any purpose without restriction under copyright law. Read more about this licence.

Credit

Reform of the University of Glasgow : considered with reference to the published report of the Royal Commissioners of Visitation appointed by Sir Robert Peel, and to the evidence and documents contained in their unpublished appendix, embracing the whole of Mr Oswald's bill for the regulation of that university, compared, clause by clause, with the constitution proposed by those commissioners / by a graduate of the University. Public Domain Mark. Source: Wellcome Collection.

Provider

This material has been provided by the Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh. The original may be consulted at the Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh.

About this work

Publication/Creation

Glasgow : R. Griffin, 1835.

Physical description

35 pages

Notes

Resp: Attributed to Thomas Clark, M.A., Glasgow. Cf. Halkett & Laing Bndg: Bound with other works Prov: Inscribed "Dr David Craigie, Edinburgh"--p. [36]

Type/Technique

Languages

Where to find it

Location of original

This material has been provided by the Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh. The original may be consulted at the Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh.

Permanent link